Occupational performance of individuals with Multiple Sclerosis based on disability level in Iran
Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a common disease across the world as well as in Iran. Individuals with MS usually experience occupational performance problems that result in limitations in their daily life. This study aimed to determine the occupational performance of individuals with MS based on the disability level in Iran.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 50 individuals with MS (20 to 50 years old) were recruited through a convenience sampling strategy from different clinics in Arak City, Iran, during 2016-2017. The Persian versions of Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) were used to assess the status of occupational performance and level of disability. The data were analyzed using chi-square, Spearman's rank correlation, and Mann-Whitney U tests.
Results: The total number of 248 occupations were identified as difficult to perform in the following areas: 125 (50.40%) in self-care, 58 (23.38%) in productivity, and 65 (26.20%) in leisure. In addition, the prioritized occupations (n = 149, median: 3, range: 1-4) had significant difference in the distribution of occupations compared with the non-prioritized occupations (P < 0.0001) and the ratings for performances and satisfactions were generally low. There were significant differences between the occupational performance and level of EDSS.
Conclusion: The findings of current study suggest that individuals with MS suffer from widespread problems in the areas of occupational performance, particularly in self-care. The findings emphasize the need for identifying the problems of daily occupations in individuals with MS.
2. Pendleton HM, Schultz-Krohn W. Pedretti's Occupational therapy-e-book: Practice skills for physical dysfunction. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2017.
3. Lexell EM, Iwarsson S, Lexell J. The complexity of daily occupations in multiple sclerosis. Scand J Occup Ther 2006; 13(4): 241-8.
4. World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2001.
5. Townsend E, Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspective. Nepean, ON: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists; 2002.
6. Hakim EA, Bakheit AM, Bryant TN, Roberts MW, McIntosh-Michaelis SA, Spackman AJ, et al. The social impact of multiple sclerosis-a study of 305 patients and their relatives. Disabil Rehabil 2000; 22(6): 288-93.
7. Cervera-Deval J, Morant-Guillen MP, Fenollosa-Vasquez P, Serra-Escorihuela M, Vilchez-Padilla J, Burguera J. Social handicaps of multiple sclerosis and their relation to neurological alterations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75(11): 1223-7.
8. McDonnell GV, Hawkins SA. An assessment of the spectrum of disability and handicap in multiple sclerosis: A population-based study. Mult Scler 2001; 7(2): 111-7.
9. Midgard R, Riise T, Nyland H. Impairment, disability, and handicap in multiple sclerosis. A cross-sectional study in an incident cohort in More and Romsdal County, Norway. J Neurol 1996; 243(4): 337-44.
10. Moosazadeh M, Esmaeili R, Mehdi Nasehi M, Abedi G, Afshari M, Farshidi F, et al. Prevalence of familial multiple sclerosis in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Iran J Neurol 2017; 16(2): 90-95.
11. Izadi S, Nikseresht A, Sharifian M, Sahraian MA, Hamidian Jahromi A, Aghighi M, et al. Significant increase in the prevalence of multiple sclerosis in Iran in 2011. Iran J Med Sci 2014; 39(2): 152-3.
12. Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 1983; 33(11): 1444-52.
13. Meyer-Moock S, Feng YS, Maeurer M, Dippel FW, Kohlmann T. Systematic literature review and validity evaluation of the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) and the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) in patients with multiple sclerosis. BMC Neurol 2014; 14: 58.
14. Dehghan L, Dalvand H, Pourshahbaz A. Translation of Canadian occupational performance measure and testing Persian version validity and reliability among Iranian mothers of children with cerebral palsy. J Mod Rehabil 2015; 9(4): 25-31.
15. Baptiste SE, Law M, Pollock N, Polatajko H, McColl MA, Carswell-Opzoomer A. The Canadian occupational performance measure. World Federation of Occupational Therapists Bulletin 1993; 28(1): 47-51.
16. Cup EH, Scholte op Reimer WJ, Thijssen MC, van Kuyk-Minis MA. Reliability and validity of the Canadian occupational performance measure in stroke patients. Clin Rehabil 2003; 17(4): 402-9.
17. Dedding C, Cardol M, Eyssen IC, Dekker J, Beelen A. Validity of the Canadian occupational performance measure: A client-centred outcome measurement. Clin Rehabil 2004; 18(6): 660-7.
18. Eyssen IC, Beelen A, Dedding C, Cardol M, Dekker J. The reproducibility of the Canadian occupational performance measure. Clin Rehabil 2005; 19(8): 888-94.
19. Finlayson M, Impey MW, Nicolle C, Edwards J. Self-care, productivity and leisure limitations of people with multiple sclerosis in Manitoba. Can J Occup Ther 1998; 65(5): 299-308.
20. Esnouf JE, Taylor PN, Mann GE, Barrett CL. Impact on activities of daily living using a functional electrical stimulation device to improve dropped foot in people with multiple sclerosis, measured by the Canadian occupational performance measure. Mult Scler 2010; 16(9): 1141-7.
21. Bodiam C. The use of the Canadian occupational performance measure for the assessment of outcome on a neurorehabilitation unit. Br J Occup Ther 1999; 62(3): 123-6.
22. Chenq YH, Rodger S, Polatjko H. Experiences with the COPM and client-centred practice in adult neurorehabilitation in Taiwan. Occup Ther Int 2002; 9(3): 167-84.
23. Donnelly C, Eng JJ, Hall J, Alford L, Giachino R, Norton K, et al. Client-centred assessment and the identification of meaningful treatment goals for individuals with a spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2004; 42(5): 302-7.
24. Eng JJ, Chu KS, Kim CM, Dawson AS, Carswell A, Hepburn KE. A community-based group exercise program for persons with chronic stroke. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35(8): 1271-8.
25. Phipps S, Richardson P. Occupational therapy outcomes for clients with traumatic brain injury and stroke using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Am J Occup Ther 2007; 61(3): 328-34.
26. Trombly CA, Radomski MV, Davis ES. Achievement of self-identified goals by adults with traumatic brain injury: Phase I. Am J Occup Ther 1998; 52(10): 810-8.
27. Trombly CA, Radomski MV, Trexel C, Burnet-Smith SE. Occupational therapy and achievement of self-identified goals by adults with acquired brain injury: Phase II. Am J Occup Ther 2002; 56(5): 489-98.
28. Khan F, Turner-Stokes L, Ng L, Kilpatrick T. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for adults with multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; (2): CD006036.
29. Doble SE, Fisk JD, Fisher AG, Ritvo PG, Murray TJ. Functional competence of community-dwelling persons with multiple sclerosis using the assessment of motor and process skills. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75(8): 843-51.
30. Mansson E, Lexell J. Performance of activities of daily living in multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil 2004; 26(10): 576-85.
31. O'Connor RJ, Cano SJ, Torrenta L, Thompson AJ, Playford ED. Factors influencing work retention for people with multiple sclerosis: Cross-sectional studies using qualitative and quantitative methods. J Neurol 2005; 252(8): 892-6.
32. Karhula ME, Kanelisto KJ, Ruutiainen J, Hamalainen PI, Salminen AL. The activities and participation categories of the ICF Core Sets for multiple sclerosis from the patient perspective. Disabil Rehabil 2013; 35(6): 492-7.
33. Isaksson G, Skar L, Lexell J. Women's perception of changes in the social network after a spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27(17): 1013-21.
34. Larsson Lund M, Nordlund A, Nygard L, Lexell J, Bernspang B. Perceptions of participation and predictors of perceived problems with participation in persons with spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Med 2005; 37(1): 3-8.
35. Gaugler JE, Given WC, Linder J, Kataria R, Tucker G, Regine WF. Work, gender, and stress in family cancer caregiving. Support Care Cancer 2008; 16(4): 347-57.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.