A survey from Turkey and Iran on comparison of risk factors and etiology in ischemic stroke

  • Gulcin Benbir Senel Department of Neurology, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Ayse Deniz Elmali Department of Neurology, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Kaveh Mehrvar Neurosciences Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
  • Mehdi Farhoudi Neurosciences Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
  • Mohammad Aboutalebi Neurosciences Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
  • Mahsa Rezaei Neurosciences Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
  • Birsen Ince Department of Neurology, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
Keywords:
Cerebrovascular Stroke, Risk Factors, Etiology, Turkey, Iran

Abstract

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neurologic disorder with a considerable global burden. During the last decades, some pharmaceutical treatments have been approved for patients with MS. Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is one of these drugs which has been reported to have early promising results in recent studies, but the efficacy of this drug in patients with MS is still being studied in different parts of the world. In the present study, we evaluated the effectiveness of DMF therapy on reducing relapses, lesions, and disability in Iranian patients with MS.
Methods: The present single-arm before-after study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran [Iranian Registry of Clinical Trial (IRCT) code: IRCT20190121042439N1]. Every patient who was diagnosed with relapsing MS was considered eligible to enroll in the present clinical trial. Before receiving DMF therapy, the baseline liver function tests and complete blood count were obtained from all individuals. Also, a baseline brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was obtained and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) was documented from all patients. After receiving 240 mg DMF twice daily for 12 months, the laboratory and imaging measurements as well as EDSS were repeated. Furthermore, the total number of relapses within the study period was recorded. Satisfaction with DMF treatment was determined by answering a yes-no question.
Results: A total number of 50 patients enrolled in the study and most of them were female (80%). There was a significant decrease in EDSS score and gadolinium (GD)-enhancing lesions after the study period (P < 0.001 for each). Moreover, the attacks significantly dropped after the study period (P < 0.001) and 86% of patients were satisfied with their treatment.
Conclusion: The findings of this study showed that 240 mg DMF administered twice daily can effectively reduce disability and provide satisfaction within the first year of therapy in patients with MS.

References

1. Farhoudi M, Mehrvar K, Sadeghi-Bazargani H, Hashemilar M, Seyedi-Vafaee M, Sadeghi-Hokmabad E, et al. Stroke subtypes, risk factors and mortality rate in northwest of Iran. Iran J Neurol 2017; 16(3): 112-7.
2. Sarbazi E, Sarbakhsh P, Savadi OD, Yazdchi M, Ghaffari-Fam S, Shamshirgaran SM. Factors related to 6-month mortality after the first-ever stroke. J Educ Health Promot 2018; 7: 113.
3. Ince B, Benbir G. Letter by Ince and Benbir regarding article, "long-term mortality in patients with stroke of undetermined etiology". Stroke 2013; 44(3): e17.
4. Adams HP, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB, Gordon DL, et al. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke 1993; 24(1): 35-41.
5. World Health Organization. World Health Statistics 2015. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2015.
Published
2019-11-10
How to Cite
1.
Benbir Senel G, Elmali A, Mehrvar K, Farhoudi M, Aboutalebi M, Rezaei M, Ince B. A survey from Turkey and Iran on comparison of risk factors and etiology in ischemic stroke. Curr J Neurol. 18(4):176-178.
Section
Letter(s) to the Editor