Comparison of intima-media thickness of common and internal carotid arteries of patients with ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage.

  • Ali Moghtaderi Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran.
  • Sharareh Sanei-Sistani Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran.
  • Ghassem Abdollahi Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran.
  • Hamid Dahmardeh Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran.
Keywords: Common Carotid Artery, Internal Carotid Artery, Intima-Media Thickness, Intracerebral Hemorrhage, Ischemic Infarction


Background: Role of atherosclerosis  in the pathogenesis of ischemic and hemorrhagic  infarctions is still matter  of debate. Intima-media thickness (IMT) of the common carotid  artery (CCA) and  internal  carotid  artery (ICA) are markers of atherosclerosis. The aim of this study was to compare  CCA IMT and ICA IMT of patients  with ischemic and hemorrhagic infarction.
Methods: Two equal groups of 80 patients  with small and large vessel ischemic stroke and 80 patients with non- traumatic  intracerebral  hemorrhage (ICH) who referred to our central teaching  hospital of Zahedan  were assessed  in this descriptive  study. IMT of four arteries  (right and  left CCA and  ICA)  were  measured,  and  collected  data  were analysis using Student’s t-test.
Results: There were  137 males  (57.1%) and  103 (42.9%) female with mean age of 62.7 ± 11.7. Mean right CCA IMT of patients  with small vessel diseases  (SVD), large vessel diseases (LVD), and ICH were 0.564 ± 0.130, 0.623 ± 0.150, and 0.580 ± 0.140 mm, respecti ely (P = 0.032). Mean left CCA IMT   of  patients   with  SVD,   LVD,   and   ICH   were 0.569  ±  0.120,  0.618  ±  0.120,  and  0.573  ±  0.130  mm, respectively (P = 0.039). The above  ?ndings  for right ICA were 0.572 ± 0.120, 0.569 ± 0.140, and 0.522 ± 0.130 mm, respectively (P = 0.145). Those ?ndings for left ICA IMT were 0.525 ± 0.110, 0.554 ± 0.120, and 0.527 ± 0.120 mm, respectively (P = 0.257).
Conclusion: Our findings showed  that by using CCA IMT, differentiation  between small and  large vessel infarctions and hemorrhagic infarctions can be made.


1. Haaga JR. CT and MRI of the whole body. 5th ed. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Mosby/Elsevier; 2009. p. 187-97
2. Murros K. Brain Infarction. In: Toole JF, editor. Cerebrovascular Disorders. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1999. p. 218-29.
3. Ghandehari K. Relation of weakness region and cerebral infarct topography. Daneshvar Med 2002; 10(41): 33-6. [In Persian].
4. Ghandehari K. Relationship of Aphasia and Topography of Cerebrovascular Territories. Sci J Hamdan Univ Med Sci 2004; 11(3): 12-5. [In Persian].
5. Ellul J, Talelli P, Terzis G, Chrysanthopoulou A, Gioldasis G, Papapetropoulos T. Is the common carotid artery intima-media thickness associated with functional outcome after acute ischaemic stroke? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004; 75(8): 1197-9.
6. Sacco RL, Toni D, Mohr JP. Classification of ischemic stroke. In: Barnett HJM, editor. Stroke: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone; 1998. p. 342-3.
7. Ghandehari K, Shuaib A. Etiologic overlaps based on the brain infarct topography. J Res Med Sci 2005; 10(4): 217-21. [In Persian].
8. Ghandehari K, Izadi-Mood Z. Atherosclerosis risk factors and etiologic mechanisms of lacunar stroke. ARYA Atheroscler 2006; 2(2): 66-9.
9. Freitas D, Alves A, Pereira A, Pereira T. Increased intima-media thickness is independently associated with ischemic stroke. Arq Bras Cardiol 2012; 98(6): 497-504.
10. Tsivgoulis G, Vemmos KN, Spengos K, Papamichael CM, Cimboneriu A, Zis V, et al. Common carotid artery intima-media thickness for the risk assessment of lacunar infarction versus intracerebral haemorrhage. J Neurol 2005; 252(9): 1093-100.
11. Special report from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. Classification of cerebrovascular diseases III. Stroke 1990; 21(4): 637-76.
12. Drobinski G, Evans JI, Eugene M, Laurenceau JL, Huberman JP, Bejean- Lebuisson A, et al. Assessment of the degree of severity of aortic stenosis. Clinical, mechanographic, echographic and hemodynamic study of 22 cases. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss 1981; 74(1): 21-7. [In French].
13. Pignoli P. Ultrasound B-mode imaging for arterial wall thickness measurement. In: Hegyeli RJ. editor. Atherosclerosis Reviews. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1984. p.177-84.
14. Pignoli P, Tremoli E, Poli A, Oreste P, Paoletti R. Intimal plus medial thickness of the arterial wall: a direct measurement with ultrasound imaging. Circulation 1986; 74(6): 1399-406.
15. Glowinska-Olszewska B, Tolwinska J, Urban M. Interrelationship between endothelial dysfunction, IMT of the carotid arteries and adhesion molecules in obese hypertensive children and adolescents. Pediatr Endocrinol Diabetes Metab 2007; 13(1): 7-14. [In Polish].
16. Pruissen DM, Gerritsen SA, Prinsen TJ, Dijk JM, Kappelle LJ, Algra A. Carotid intima-media thickness is different in largeand small-vessel ischemic stroke: the SMART study. Stroke 2007; 38(4): 1371-3.
17. Cupini LM, Pasqualetti P, Diomedi M, Vernieri F, Silvestrini M, Rizzato B, et al. Carotid artery intima-media thickness and lacunar versus nonlacunar infarcts. Stroke 2002; 33(3): 689-94.
18. Touboul PJ, Elbaz A, Koller C, Lucas C, Adrai V, Chedru F, et al. Common carotid artery intima-media thickness and brain infarction: the Etude du Profil Genetique de l'Infarctus Cerebral (GENIC) case-control study. The GENIC Investigators. Circulation 2000; 102(3): 313-8.
19. Tsivgoulis G, Vemmos K, Papamichael C, Spengos K, Manios E, Stamatelopoulos K, et al. Common carotid artery intima-media thickness and the risk of stroke recurrence. Stroke 2006; 37(7): 1913-6.
20. Ohira T, Shahar E, Iso H, Chambless LE, Rosamond WD, Sharrett AR, et al. Carotid artery wall thickness and risk of stroke subtypes: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Stroke 2011; 42(2): 397-403.
21. Lorenz MW, von Kegler S, Steinmetz H, Markus HS, Sitzer M. Carotid intima-media thickening indicates a higher vascular risk across a wide age range: prospective data from the Carotid Atherosclerosis Progression Study (CAPS). Stroke 2006; 37(1): 87-92.
22. Khorvash F, Rahimi M, Bagherian-Sararoudi R, Mousavi SA, Ebneshahidi A, Amirpour A, et al. Evaluation of intima media thickness of carotid arteries in 40-60 years old persons with type D personality and its comparison with normal ones. Int J Prev Med 2013; 4(Suppl 2): S250-S255. [In Persian].
23. Khan SN, Vohra EA. Risk Factors for Stroke: A hospital based study. Pak J Med Sci 2007; 23(1): 17-22.
24. Lin YT, Lo YK, Kuo HC, Chang YT, Chang MH, Li JY. Stroke registry in Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei) 2002; 65(7): 307-13.
25. Sadeq H. Analysis of cerebrovascular accidents at prince Hashem Hospital, Jordan. J Res Med Sci 2003; 10(2): 69-72.
26. Kitamura A, Iso H, Imano H, Ohira T, Okada T, Sato S, et al. Carotid intima-media thickness and plaque characteristics as a risk factor for stroke in Japanese elderly men. Stroke 2004; 35(12): 2788-94.
How to Cite
Moghtaderi A, Sanei-Sistani S, Abdollahi G, Dahmardeh H. Comparison of intima-media thickness of common and internal carotid arteries of patients with ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage. Iran J Neurol. 13(4):226-230.
Special Articles